Greetings Explorer, Navigate into the Lobby!
Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Be sure to "Get Whitelisted" to join the community on server!
*Looks at Cory with that big handprint mark on her face*Fair enough
Edit:
The Demon Mark event ended abruptly and I'm fairly sure there's still ppl with marks running around
And yeah... "Just die and it's gone!" doesn't really help either xD*Looks at Cory with that big handprint mark on her face*
One thing I didn't get was the event how the Makani was introduced. It all seemed like there was a natural disaster coming for every settlement due to how the events were named, but we ended up with a new race.Yeah I've had some pretty harsh complaints with many of our campaigns- primarily due to the stories being switched up/left unfinished.
Now that part I'll disagree with. I don't really care who is in-charge of lore. Personally to me, regardless of if it's Arch or Dee, from personal experiences they've both got downsides to them getting any sort of "coordinator" position, but they've also both got qualities that are nice for the position. I'm not going to talk shit about a person earning a position, especially if they haven't even been given a chance to prove if they're good or bad for the position yet.I think Archbishop is a great staff member and an abysmal pick for lore. He should have moved to the position of in game tech coordination.
It's concerning when I find myself agreeing with everything in one of your posts, Glados.It's really starting to feel like you're trying to change what the server and community is without veering away from the trademarked name. The only classic things appropriate to what our world and our community used to be seem to be the gods, the elementals, and the players.
Essentially what I mean is the vision ongoing appears to be like a reboot that's completely different to the past while using the name for its value. Why do this instead of just changing the foundation behind the scenes and in the lore? It would certainly come with less backlash.
I think Archbishop is a great staff member and an abysmal pick for lore. He should have moved to the position of in game tech coordination.
you are already deadREEEEEEPUUUUTAAAATION MECHANNNINCS
pretty good summation of hw k_hand: k_hand:What is dead may never die
I shifted you to an advisory and aid position. You know why, we talked about it and agreed to it. We were trying to work things out but I needed to move on in the time I have right now. I could not leave things as they were because you chose to step out by choice already. @All who are asking about it- Dee's got a good heart and he's a good part of Lore, but a coordinator of Lore needs to be a coordinator of Lore. I've given Dee a position where he can actually focus on what he wants to do for Lore and this server instead of focusing his attention to other things and other people.You put me on the same level as Ced, who hasn't done anything in over half a year.
As a public FAQ, since I was not made privy to these changes until after they were decided in the staff forum, I'd like to hear the planned approach on:
- Fixing Magic; pacing is imbalanced, the disciplines are fragmented with some not even having a dedicated Magus while certain spells in particular are complete nonsense.
- Catering to old server lore; since no one else would consult Mich or reach out to the old Loremasters to fill in gaps that are documented outside the forums.
- The plan for the Divines and cleaning up the current alterations and retcons to the mythos that is still on the server lore and had players that still play characters from that time.
- Finding a way to do so with Events bridging the gap instead of witholding information.
Hands have changed, Staff have changed- I don't believe everyone should expect this server to stay the same as it was 5 years ago or 2 years ago. That's the explanation I can give for your first part. Second, I'm not sure much about- seems to be more of an opinion and a suggestion to which I'll say I've seen it.It's really starting to feel like you're trying to change what the server and community is without veering away from the trademarked name. The only classic things appropriate to what our world and our community used to be seem to be the gods, the elementals, and the players.
Essentially what I mean is the vision ongoing appears to be like a reboot that's completely different to the past while using the name for its value. Why do this instead of just changing the foundation behind the scenes and in the lore? It would certainly come with less backlash.
..I distinctly remember you saying the same thing about me in the public threads when I was handed the position of Owner of this Server. You said something along the lines of me deciding what's best for players, that I may not be a good choice for an owner and that I think I'm better than people. Has the opinion changed? If it has, then I'd like there to be a chance given to Arch- because he's up for the challenge. If it hasn't, then I leave you to your opinion.I think Archbishop is a great staff member and an abysmal pick for lore. He should have moved to the position of in game tech coordination.
I'm sorry?what an awful answer
I'm sorry?
what an awful answer
Come on man, at the very least don't just be an asshole to be an asshole.what an awful answer