This is very though-provoking

[Valonyx]

 

[Legion]

thought provoking how exactly?
I mean it was interesting but it didnt exactly make any new assertions or even present an original concept.

 

[Jupa15]

thought provoking how exactly?
I mean it was interesting but it didnt exactly make any new assertions or even present an original concept.

No.
But it makes you think.
When you throw out your toaster.
It could be begging for a second chance.

 

[Valonyx]

thought provoking how exactly?
I mean it was interesting but it didnt exactly make any new assertions or even present an original concept.

Isn't it obvious? It makes you think about the one day where we will become what we once called Gods, creators of sentient life, in the form of intelligent androids able to have emotions.

 

[Legion]

Isn't it obvious? It makes you think about the one day where we will become what we once called Gods, creators of sentient life, in the form of intelligent androids able to have emotions.

This idea has been around since Frankenstein.

And to be honest Mary Shelley made her point better~

 

[Naelwyn]

THAT IS NOT THE REACTION TO HAVE WITH AN EMERGENT AI.

REAAGHALBLAGLBMENAGNAGH.

 

[Deash12]

Here's something that'll get your brains moving,
If we are counting sheep, then what are the sheep counting?!!??!?!?!

 

[Valonyx]

This idea has been around since Frankenstein.

And to be honest Mary Shelley made her point better~

I could argue that Frankenstein isn't comparable, because he is a monster of a fantasy book, a kind of zombie, or to be extremely simple, a ambiguously revived corpse. An android, while being a much more possible alternative to Frankenstein, is also much more complex and advanced then a story.
But I understand your point, it is true that we've been thinking to those things for decades now, but what I meant is that with our technologies, it's more and more conceivable.

 

[Michcat]

REAAGHALBLAGLBMENAGNAGH.

This, alll of this-

 

[Naelwyn]

I could argue that Frankenstein isn't comparable, because he is a monster of a fantasy book, a kind of zombie, or to be extremely simple, a ambiguously revived corpse. An android, while being a much more possible alternative to Frankenstein, is also much more complex and advanced then a story.
But I understand your point, it is true that we've been thinking to those things for decades now, but what I meant is that with our technologies, it's more and more conceivable.

You mean 'Frankenstein's Monster' who actually goes by the name 'Adam' and goes under much symbolism?

 

[Legion]

The only difference between Frankenstein's monster and the machine in the video above is that Dr. Frankenstein used organic computers where the creator of the android used silicon ones.

And to be honest I dont think the first AI will be in the form of an android, and I also dont think it will be accidental.

 

[Frankieba5]

Is this going to be a game, or is it just some technology foreshadowing?

 

[Bean/Benijim]

Should be a film!
Although it looks a bit similar to I-Robot

 

[Frankieba5]

Should be a film!
Although it looks a bit similar to I-Robot

So...this time instead of Will Smith we will have Denzel Washington!
RERAIL!

 

[Valonyx]

You mean 'Frankenstein's Monster' who actually goes by the name 'Adam' and goes under much symbolism?

Yeah, not talking about Dr Viktor Frankenstein.

 

[Valonyx]

Is this going to be a game, or is it just some technology foreshadowing?

Nah, its just a short film that Sony made, I don't even know if there was an economic goal behind it or if they just did it for recreational purposes.