Medieval & Fantasy Minecraft Roleplaying
Greetings Explorer, Navigate into the Lobby!
Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
Be sure to "Get Whitelisted" to join the community on server!
-
Greetings Guest, Welcome to our Medieval Roleplaying Server, HollowWorld! Get Whitelisted Today and join us! Then check out our Starter Guide made just for you.
-
Keep up-to-date on the Server Campaigns!
-
Here's a guide to the Prestige plugin! Read it here.
-
To purchase property at Storm's Landing, Please Click Here!
-
Hey, Guest! Contribute to the Server to keep us Alive!
Active Jarl Freya Lonmar
- Thread starter Faelin
- Start date
I think Freya technically became Jarl at age...
Hmm, gotta go back through my timeline of things. I think it's 15, might be 14.
Hmm, gotta go back through my timeline of things. I think it's 15, might be 14.
I thought I saw you lurking around 'ere somewhere.
mokwar
Evil
Yeah!
Started out as 12-13 years, homeless and on the street and went to the high noble life at age 16!
Progress!
Tybalt
Lord of Altera
I believe he started at 15.
mokwar
Evil
But Amy started at age 12-13 and is around 23-24 now.
Through soon 2 years of having her as a character, but.
/rerail.
frank frappuccino
Lord of Altera
Look into the eyes of the toad: You saw nothing...I thought I saw you lurking around 'ere somewhere.
mokwar
Evil
May want to add an epilepsy warning there.
Some people may have it and go to this thread.
Some fairly significant changes to relations.
Note: it is about as concise as I could get it while still making sense, and the reality is still a lot more complicated.
The biggest point to note is that this loosely reflects how Freya consciously views other people (consciously, you'll note, not the same thing as rationally). Some more subconscious opinions are often very deliberately ignored, whereas others are allowed to solidify into clearer, chosen views. Long story short, she evaluates people in a very controlled way. This adds to the mix the caveat that it is not always true to what she may really or subconsciously believe.
Another complication is the fact that the scale of how much one is liked does not necessarily correlate with how much one is trusted, and therefore notable oddities may be listed in multiple sections. Some who perhaps should be are not. Again, see above.
Similarly, the degrees of trust are also somewhat circumstantial. While one person may be trusted with some things, they might be exactly the opposite for others. Got a person you would trust with your life, but wouldn't trust not to blurt out something you tell them in confidence?
Yeaaaah...
The joys of human nature, huh?
Another way of explaining this would be through the medium of my dear cat. I would, in a passive sense, trust my cat with my life. I would not trust my cat to actively attempt to protect my life if I were endangered. I would not trust my cat with a small child. I would actively distrust my cat with, say, a gerbil, or a fish, or my toes.
Same principle applies to people, though I hope that most characters would be able to responsibly handle a gerbil without cause for concern.
Note: it is about as concise as I could get it while still making sense, and the reality is still a lot more complicated.
The biggest point to note is that this loosely reflects how Freya consciously views other people (consciously, you'll note, not the same thing as rationally). Some more subconscious opinions are often very deliberately ignored, whereas others are allowed to solidify into clearer, chosen views. Long story short, she evaluates people in a very controlled way. This adds to the mix the caveat that it is not always true to what she may really or subconsciously believe.
Another complication is the fact that the scale of how much one is liked does not necessarily correlate with how much one is trusted, and therefore notable oddities may be listed in multiple sections. Some who perhaps should be are not. Again, see above.
Similarly, the degrees of trust are also somewhat circumstantial. While one person may be trusted with some things, they might be exactly the opposite for others. Got a person you would trust with your life, but wouldn't trust not to blurt out something you tell them in confidence?
Yeaaaah...
The joys of human nature, huh?
Another way of explaining this would be through the medium of my dear cat. I would, in a passive sense, trust my cat with my life. I would not trust my cat to actively attempt to protect my life if I were endangered. I would not trust my cat with a small child. I would actively distrust my cat with, say, a gerbil, or a fish, or my toes.
Same principle applies to people, though I hope that most characters would be able to responsibly handle a gerbil without cause for concern.
Spark
Broken
How did I only just notice this? D:
huurrdurr, falling asleep when everyone is srs bsns since 2013
Spark
Broken
Wow, I actually forgot about that.
.........
.....
....
Hmmmm.
EDIT: Assuming Lonmar council meetings were EVER "srs bsns".
We did have some quite good meetings when I lived in my little hut
*So incredibly tempted to make a "rejected" section on relations*
...Hnrhggh.
*Resists*
Sadko
Lord of Altera
sadko12345
Do it!
Michcat
i'm the wench if you're the cake ;)
AFAIK shes currently sixteen...
ForestRose
The rosiest of forests.
ForestRose
*Happily sits there doodling Freya and Jaret for life*