Map Update:
View attachment 60760
Change Log:
> Southern jungles held by Upresh.
> Upreshian forces added.
> Visualization adjusted to show circles instead of lines for displaying units. Civilization style.
Let me know what you think of the new "Civ" style for showing units. Considering the map uses hexes, I thought it would be fitting to go full civilization and place units by the hex rather than by the line. Of course, all of this is just for simplicity's sake so I'm not drawing with an insane amount of detail.
One of the benefits of using a "Civ" style for showing units is that it is easier to determine how many units each nation has. Under this method, I have assumed that each nation has one unit for approximately every ten points on its Defense Forces stat. This would give Carausmia 7 units, Upresh 4 units, Legisa 8 units, and Natrizima 10 units.
Currently, I have all 4 Upreshian units in the south to conduct guerrilla warfare on the transportation routes. 4 Natrizima units are stationed by the eastern city, as per their campaign. 4 Legisan units are in the northwest along the border, as per their campaign. This allocation theoretically leaves Legisa with 4 more units and Natrizima with 6 more units. However, I would imagine that neither nation would contribute all of their units to this war. As you can see on the map, for example, I have 1 unit placed in each major Legisan city for Legisa's basic national defense.
@
MaelstromPuddle
@
LightTwig
Let me know how many units your nations would likely contribute and where they would likely be stationed! For ease of conducting war, you may assume basic Civilization movements and such, though I'd rather not include city health. In other words, if you leave a city un-garrisoned, you should
not assume that it will hold up for a turn or two against enemy attacks all on its own. Also, try to campaign somewhat realistically; for example, don't charge forward and leave your supply lines completely undefended.